Social participation on the subject of Hamwara on issues of interest to the Shiite jurists of Buddh, and Shiite jurists based on the verses of the Qur’an and the narrations of the infallibles (peace be upon them) with the clarification of Al-Zamāsh and his purity, but with the evidence of Naboud, a separate chapter on jurisprudence in my opinion. Banwan’s rulings are harmonious, as his views are sought. This is an investigation with the goal of clarifying jurisprudential obligations towards social participation, with the centrality of the verses of the rulings, duties and prohibitions, what is the effectiveness of this opinion, and the removal of doubts related to these opinions, and with the aim of a qualitative analysis of the verses of the Qur’an. There is an obligatory ruling and a prohibitive ruling in the Qur’an in this context. Provisions regarding the obligation of social participation in the following terms: the obligation to cover one’s entire body with any publicity or touching it, the obligation to avoid anything such as bringing a sexual orientation that is forbidden, or to wear a hijab. How to express it. Provisions prohibiting social participation in other words: It is forbidden to display oneself (beauty) and according to the Qur’an, it is forbidden to leave a house without permission for a period of time, and it is forbidden to smoke, eat, or drink. This is the reason for investigating this suspicion: 1- Abzari’s accusation of adultery, and the veil of adultery in order to prevent it from being wronged. 2- The morals of the person who betrayed him and robbed him of his will, or in order to leave the house, remove the burden. Ast.